News
Ford needs its Escape SUV to be more things to more people. Now that the large Territory no longer exists and the full-size Everest might be too big and bulky for the average suburban family, the ...
The Same But Different Unsurprisingly, we found the 2.0-Liter EcoBoost Escape to display the same competent road manners as the previously tested 1.5-liter EcoBoost Titanium.
The 2017 Ford Escape starts at $23,600 for the base S trim and tops out at $29,100 for the Titanium model. In between is the SE 4WD that we tested, with a base price of $28,145.
On the Escape SE and Titanium cars, the 1.5-liter will be standard. Though it's smaller than the outgoing 1.6-liter engine from the old car, Ford expects it to still deliver around 180 HP and 185 ...
Read our full 2017 Ford Escape review for pros, cons, pricing, and expert insights. Our editors test drive over 200 vehicles a year to help car shoppers pick the right vehicle for them.
The price for the mid-range S 4WD trim is $28,099 MSRP. The most expensive in the lineup, Titanium 4WD is priced at $35,999 Canadian dollars.
The 2017 Ford Escape is a big improvement on what was an already remarkable crossover, and the customer-focused changes pay dividends to the Escape faithful.
The new Ford Escape gets a new look and a name change. But is the flagship Titanium diesel worth the near $50,000 spend?
So What’s New? The 2017 Escape Titanium we drove for this test boasted a host of new features, starting with its 1.5-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine. Making 179 horsepower and 177 lb-ft ...
Ruby Red Metallic 2017 Ford Escape Titanium 4WD 6-Speed Automatic 1.5L EcoBoost 4WD, Emergency communication system: SYNC 3 911 Assist, Equipment Group 300A, Heated front seats, Panoramic Vista Roof, ...
The 2017 Ford Escape is the first Ford vehicle to make Auto Start-Stop technology standard with either of the two EcoBoost offerings – a 1.5-liter engine and a 2.0-liter twin-scroll. Auto Start ...
2017 Ford Escape: Better tech, but less fuel economy The 1.5-liter EcoBoost engine is inexplicably less fuel efficient than its 1.6-liter predecessor despite automatic start-stop technology.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results